NSW: It's been 87 years, we're done with shark nets!

Email your local MP, as well as the Fisheries and Environment Ministers in New South Wales (NSW) to ask them to modernise their archaic approach to shark bite mitigation.

People and wildlife both deserve better than the current indiscriminate culling programs, that don't provide any real protection. These programs are at best a placebo, and at worst are luring large sharks closer to beaches. NSW deserves better.

Although it related to Queensland's program, the outcome of Humane Society International (Australia) Inc v Department of Agriculture & Fisheries (Qld) AATA Case in 2019 proved "overwhelmingly" that mesh nets and drumlines do not make any impact on safety, negatively impact the marine ecosystem, and provide beachgoers with a false sense of security.

"The lethal component of the SCP (Shark Control Program) does not reduce the risk of unprovoked shark interactions. The scientific evidence before us is overwhelming in this regard." Humane Society International (Australia) Inc v Department of Agriculture & Fisheries (Qld)

The "Shark mitigation and deterrent measures" Senate Inquiry (2017) also found substantial evidence that Mesh Nets and Drumlines do not make any impact on safety, negatively impact the marine Ecosystem, and provide beach goers with a false sense of security - and recommended they cease in favour of modern non-lethal technologies.

Email your local MP, as well as the Fisheries and Environment Ministers in New South Wales (NSW) to ask them to modernise their archaic approach to shark bite mitigation.

People and wildlife both deserve better than the current indiscriminate culling programs, that don't provide any real protection. These programs are at best a placebo, and at worst are luring large sharks closer to beaches. NSW deserves better.

Although it related to Queensland's program, the outcome of Humane Society International (Australia) Inc v Department of Agriculture & Fisheries (Qld) AATA Case in 2019 proved "overwhelmingly" that mesh nets and drumlines do not make any impact on safety, negatively impact the marine ecosystem, and provide beachgoers with a false sense of security.

"The lethal component of the SCP (Shark Control Program) does not reduce the risk of unprovoked shark interactions. The scientific evidence before us is overwhelming in this regard." Humane Society International (Australia) Inc v Department of Agriculture & Fisheries (Qld)

The "Shark mitigation and deterrent measures" Senate Inquiry (2017) also found substantial evidence that Mesh Nets and Drumlines do not make any impact on safety, negatively impact the marine Ecosystem, and provide beach goers with a false sense of security - and recommended they cease in favour of modern non-lethal technologies.

Email your local MP to support the removal of shark nets!

185 emails sent

Find your local rep

Compose your email

Subject:

Dear Ministers,

I write to you as my local MP, and also the two Ministers jointly responsible for New South Wales shark nets, as per the shark meshing Joint Management Agreement (JMA).

I understand that the Joint Management Agreement has not met its objectives for the past decade, and that all scientific advice before you, is that shark nets should not have been returned to the water on Sept 1st.

Ms Sharpe, you can help to achieve this by using your powers to terminate the JMA for failing to meet its objectives for over a decade. We feel this document acts as nothing more than a license to kill, and as the only such agreement in the entire state, has no place in modern Government.

Ms Moriarty, you can achieve this by following scientific advice of both the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (TSSC) and Fisheries Scientific Committee (FSC) to discontinue the use of shark nets, in favour of the suite of modern non-lethal technologies already being successfully used in NSW.

We have learnt so much about sharks and the ocean since 1937, and it is now time to put this archaic and ineffective program behind us, in line with your election commitment.

Thank you for your time, and I truly hope 2024 is the year that we bring NSW beach safety into the 21st century.

How we use the data you enter on this form

Do Gooder (the advocacy platform powering this online action) processes personal information from you that you enter on this form so that we can provide the functions and related services to you and The Campaigner (the organisation responsible for this online action) for their legitimate purposes, including possibly exporting it to other systems, and to effectively respond to enquiries and communications related to those services.

Specifically when you enter:

Your location data (residential address or postcode) it is used to locate your elected representative, to pre-populate your email signature and to provide The Campaigner with a visualisation of the location of the support for this campaign.
All other data you may enter, including your email address, name, telephone number, commentary and so on is used by The Campaigner to advocate for the campaign’s goals and where required may be sent to the target of the campaign.

The data collected by Do Gooder is also used by us in aggregate form to improve the service and may be held on your behalf outside your country of residence by our third party service providers. These providers are bound by contract to only use personal information on our behalf, in accordance with agreed terms. While the privacy laws of the country in which personal information is stored or transferred may be different from those in your country, we will always have safeguards in place when storing or transferring personal information. We will never sell, rent, loan or in any other way pass your information on to other parties other than to provide this service to you and The Campaigner.

The personal information collected by Do Gooder is held subject to a Data Processing Agreement between Do Gooder and The Campaigner in compliance with the EU's GDPR and Australian law.

Learn more about our privacy policy here

How is my data used?